INTRODUCTION
      
           I’ve been a Transformers fan for over two
      decades and there’s one conclusion I’ve come to: 
          Starscream can’t win.
          No matter how hard he tries, he can’t become
      the permanent leader of the Decepticons or have any lasting
      victories in the grand scheme. Starscream is limited by the fact
      he’s a personality in a toy concept and cannot ever be allowed to
      truly evolve as a character. The same is true to an extent about
      Optimus Prime, Megatron, Hot Rod and any other established
      character. 
          No matter where it goes, people remember
      certain characters in a certain way. Starscream is a traitorous
      back stabber. He connives and schemes but never truly succeeds.
      The other Decepticons won’t take him seriously. Megatron always
      comes back from the dead and gives him his comeuppance (in the
      case of Galvatron, lethally so). Even when he does enact a scheme,
      it’s doomed to fail because despite his ambitions, Starscream
      simply isn’t up to the task of leadership and experiencing true
      power.
          In traditional storytelling, characters have a
      problem. Be it with another person, nature or an internal
      conflict. The story typically follows them as they attempt to
      address the problem. Most of the time they overcome their problem
      and are changed by their experience. Occasionally, they fail and
      must suffer the consequences of that failure. This is not true,
      however, in mass media storytelling where a character’s story
      never truly ends, people expect a certain archetype and the reset
      button can be pressed at any time.
          The above is a major factor in why I did the Balance of Power
      storyline where Starscream breaks with the Decepticons permanently
      and has some success as a new third power. Frankly, I got tired of
      the same-old, same-old and wanted to see something different for a
      change. I wrote a scheming, dangerous and competent Starscream who
      has an ultimate fate at the end of his story. 
          It would be interesting to see an official
      medium truly shake up the status quo in a permanent manner.
      Imagine a comic series where Optimus Prime dies–and stays dead. Or
      where the Great War winds down permanently in the course of the
      story and the newly pacifist Transformers must deal with different
      threats to their existence. The possibilities are endless. (IDW is
      doing something different with their More Then Meets The Eye and Robots in Disguise comics
      right now–but watch it be undone later when a new writer comes
      along or the company wants to try and boost sales again. I’d love
      something truly permanent in the story).
          To relate this issue to comics (specifically Marvel and DC, but also companies like Image and whoever else has a
      long running character/concept), I feel like character/concept
      stagnation is a major contributor to why the field seems to be
      slowly dying (that, and crappy storytelling, of course). If
      nothing can ever truly change then nothing really matters. Any
      story conflict is ultimately rendered irrelevant.
          The companies will not give up a cash cow, of
      course. That’s bad business. But why must innovation be brought to
      a near-complete standstill in order to justify profit? In an era
      where monthly comics are becoming more and more irrelevant in
      favor of trade paperbacks, why don’t the comic companies just
      abandon the monthly format all together and tell one-off stories
      instead? 
          As Transformers goes, can’t Hasbro or its
      creative partners give some of the usual cliches of the concept a
      break? I’m not saying never use Starscream again, nor Optimus
      Prime versus Megatron, nor Optimus Prime’s guilt and self-doubt.
      But why not explore some new characters against the backdrop of
      the war? Optimus, Starscream, etc. can still be there to have toys
      (and protect trademarks, etc) but why not have some new guys do
      something different for a year or two? Stop always giving fans
      what they’ve come to expect. Try to innovate a little bit.
      Surprise us sometimes. Either way, we’ll still be there–watching
      the cartoon, reading the comic and buying the toys. 
          We’re good that way...
      
      Til All Are One!
      Thunder
    
        
          
    
       Transmasters Magazine.
            Issue #13, WINTER 2012
      
      
      
      
      REVIEW: Recent TF
              toys!
              ARTICLE: Transformers Regeneration
                One.
                20 years later, where do we go from here?
            ARTICLE: Animated Eggs (by Johan Piest)
              REVIEW: Transformers
                Prime: Darkness Rising DVD
            PROFILE:
              Bacauldra (by Jay Gutzman)
            PROFILE: Basalasar (by Jay Gutzman)
        PROFILE: Beeper (by
              Jay Gutzman)
        PROFILE: Belle (by
              Jay Gutzman)
        PROFILE: Bob (by
              Jay Gutzman)
        PROFILE: Borealis
              Prime (by Jay Gutzman)
         REVIEW: Transformers: Rescue Bots
        FICTION: Unchained
            Comic
              Round-up
        
      
      
      
      
    
    Unless noted, this issue was produced by Tony "Thunder"
          Klepack. Contributions for future issues are welcome and
          encouraged! 
      
    (Some stock graphics were designed by Peter Phelps. Thanks
        to him for his many efforts). 
      
    
        The Transformers are Copyright and Trademark 2012
        Hasbro/Takara Tomy. All rights Reserved. The TransMasters
        are a Non-profit club for and by Transfans.
        
        
        Magazine
          Index